As one of the first blogs to report on energy efficiency in CNC machining, We felt it important to post on Siemens new product the Sinumerik Ctrl-E.  This post contains specs on the product and how it can help save in electricity cost as well as aid your business in garnering a “green” reputation. According to a recent EU Commission report, industrial production accounted for 40 percent of total power consumption in the EU-27 in 2007, of which 70 percent was used by electrical drive systems. Depending on the company involved, machine tools can account for up to 68 percent of the total energy requirement. This fact makes energy efficiency in manufacturing a decisive factor in reducing plant costs and improving overall competitiveness. Siemens kept this in mind when it carried out an energy analysis of individual machine tool components with the goal of achieving significant cuts in energy consumption through Sinumerik Ctrl-Energy.

With Sinumerik Ctrl-Energy, Siemens has opened up a broad range of solutions for the energy-efficient operation of machine tools, encompassing its Sinamics drive systems and motors, CNC and drive function and PC software solutions. Sinumerik Ctrl-Energy offers energy-efficient solutions covering every aspect of the machine’s lifecycle, starting from machine design and engineering through machine operation and partial or complete retrofit. This makes Sinumerik Ctrl-Energy a broad-based platform for efficient machine management, which will benefit both the machine tool OEM and end-user.
By holding ‘Ctrl E’  on the operator panel, Sinumerik CNCs can provide a fast evaluation of the machine tool’s energy consumption and also manage energy consumption during machine downtime. Using the ‘Ctrl-E Analysis’ function, Sinumerik controls determine both the energy consumption of a drive system and the entire machine. They enable the user to analyze the amount of energy that goes into machining every individual workpiece as the basis for machining strategy improvements. The ‘Ctrl-E Profiles’ function also provides a configuration platform for the management of the machine’s energy saving modes, helping to selectively shut down specific power loads during downtimes.

FREQUENCY CONVERTERS AND ENERGY-SAVING MOTORS — THE INTEGRATED DRIVE TRAIN AS A CORE ELEMENT OF OVERALL ENERGY EFFICIENCY
The Siemens Sinamics S120 drive system permits dynamic energy management in the DC link and makes use of a highly efficient power recovery system, which initially stores generated braking energy in a DC link and optionally feeds it back into the grid rather than allowing the brake resistance to turn it into heat. Sinamics drives and Siemens motors have been designed with a clear focus on energy efficiency aspects. In this manner, integrated drive modules from Siemens reach a high efficiency rating of 97–99 percent.

With an efficiency of up to 94 percent in synchronous motors and up to 91 percent in asynchronous motors, the Siemens motor range also provides a basis for energy-efficient machine designs. In a typical machine tool, auxiliary assemblies such as hydraulic supply systems or cooling and lubrication units account for over half the total energy consumption. Energy-saving 1LE standard asynchronous motors have an efficiency rating of up to 97 percent and offer significant potential for auxiliary assembly improvement. The use of Sinamics G120 frequency converters helps adjust the speed and also the energy consumption of auxiliary systems to the level required at each stage of
the process.

POTENTIAL SAVINGS: CURRENT FLOW REDUCTION AND POWER FACTOR COMPENSATION
Sinamics S120 drive systems permit automatic current flow reduction in asynchronous spindles operating under part-load, avoiding unnecessary heat loss. The reactive power of a machine can be fully compensated using the smart infeed and feedback modules of Sinamics S120 drives, rendering costly and loss-prone reactive power compensation units on the end user’s premises superfluous.

CONTROL CABINETS ALSO HELP EFFICIENCY
Control cabinets, along with the required dissipation of heat, have a significant impact on the energy balance of a machine. Siemens can supply machine tool builders with a complete control cabinet that is designed with optimum energy management in mind. Various cooling options exist, including cold plate and direct fluid cooling, which reduce the need for air-conditioning in the control cabinet and make waste heat produced by the drive systems available elsewhere in the form of process heat.

SIZER — THE CONFIGURATION TOOL FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT DRIVES
Sizer is the Siemens software tool used to configure energy-efficient drives. It calculates energy consumption and losses incurred with the anticipated load cycles (ramp-up, idle running, running under load, braking, cycle times etc.), as well as the influence of regenerative feedback. This allows the energy efficiency of alternative motor/converter combinations to be evaluated. Using this information, configuration of the feed and main spindle axes can be optimized in line with the process and the anticipated cyclical work flows. Sizer also helps users to avoid over-dimensioning, also in terms of infeed, and to minimize energy consumption.

Twice a year, ThomasNet releases their Industry Market Barometer which is a survey that helps to get a better idea on how different buyers and sellers are feeling about their businesses and what they are doing to overcome challenges. This particular survey asked nearly 3,400 buyers and sellers of industrial goods a series of questions to gauge their success moving forward.

The majority of those surveyed are from small companies—fewer than 100 employees and less than $10 million a year in revenue. What was found in the survey is that there is a growing optimism toward things and that they are anticipating more demand for their goods.

Two groups, specifically, that emerged in this survey are the “Outperformers” and the “Optimists.” The “Outperformer” is someone who had growth in the second half of 2010 and had anticipated more growth by June 2011. The “Optimists” anticipated growth by June 2010, but experienced a steady or declining growth in the second half of 2010.

Across the entire industrial marketplace, 45 percent of industrial companies are continuing to grow in comparison to 18 percent who aren’t. In every region and every sector of business, these numbers are true.

This growth can be attributed to two things: a heavy reliance on customer retention and service and utilizing their websites and the Internet to market their company.

The IMB revealed that 68% of respondents found customers cutting back or closing shop to be their top challenge. To try and prevent this from being a challenge in the future, 31% of companies are hiring customer service positions.

Demand is up, according to these companies. Thirty-seven percent of respondents anticipated hiring new employees through June 2011. Of those companies, 43% are hiring skilled trade workers and 36% are hiring engineering staff. Demand is, as these numbers would show, up and that is something that will convert into jobs.

Many more companies are realizing the need to move online and market themselves there. By utilizing their own website and a directory such as ThomasNet, companies are finding an increase in revenue growth. Of all IMB respondents, 76 percent reported that their website made a contribution to growth from July to December 2010.

Over half of the “Outperformers” revealed that their website opened up new sources of business which resulted in new revenues.

There are still things that need to be to make the online experience more worthwhile. Buyers are looking for websites that include product comparisons so that purchasing is easier. More importantly, they want to see the prices and product information to ensure that the product they are getting is exactly what they want.

The economy is obviously hurting and companies are hesitant to hire. However, what the IMB shows is that there is growth in the industrial sector and companies are beginning to add people to ensure that they can reach the demand presented to them by their customers.

Focusing on Unique Services

Technology Perspective

The Lone Studer

Excellent Service

Fighting Back

by Jay Pierson

I don’t remember when Dual Contact Toolholders first hit the market, but when I saw them I imagined they’d be a flash-in-the-pan product. At this point it seems like they’re more hit than miss and here to stay.

I’m know there are a lot of other engineers that are far smarter than me that have developed these products but there’s just something about dual contact holders that doesn’t sit right with me. I really don’t see how supporting the toolholder’s flange is going to increase rigidity. I also imagine that any chips or grime between the flange and spindle nose will interfere with the tool seating properly in the taper and vice versa. Are regular toolholders really that unstable that I need dual contact? Is the toolholder really the problem and not the 1″ tool that it’s holding? Does anyone else have these thoughts? Is this a case of good marketing over good product? It reminds me of a story that happened to me a long while back.

Me – So you really think it’s flexing too much?
Rider – Dude, totally!
Me – So let me get this straight, you’re wearing padded gloves while holding on to foam padded handlebar grips that are attached to 24″ wide hollow handlebars and you think the 3″ long aluminum stem is the part that’s flexing?
Rider – Yup.
Me – Ok let’s go over this… The stem is connected to a 4″ travel suspension fork that uses 0.050″ diameter spokes that connect with a thin aluminum rim that holds a rubber tire that rolls on unstable dirt. Are you sure what you’re feeling is the stem flexing and not one of the other components?
Rider – Dude, I know my bike. The stem has too much flex. I’M POSITIVE!
Me – Ok. Thanks for the feedback.
Rider – Don’t I get a T-shirt or something?

We ran a second round of tests but this time we hyped up the product beforehand by showing charts, graphs and fancy engineering terms. Guess what… the results were phenomenal. We took it a step further. We brought back the original group of test riders and took them through the same presentation. We told them their feedback was instrumental in improving the design. We used the exact same stems from the original test and once again the feedback was 100% positive. I specifically spoke to my original tester (Dude) to see what he had to say – “Dude, you guys really rocked it with this new design. Now do I get a T-shirt?”

This is a long story to get to my point – perception is reality. Are Dual Contact Toolholders really better or are we buying into better marketing? Hopefully I haven’t made any enemies, but I’ve definitely opened a can of worms. Let’s hear your comments below.

On the surface, aerospace machining is pretty straightforward: precision operations done a step at a time. Although exacting, it’s frequently left-brain work that’s comfortably predictable. It’s mostly pocket milling, process monitoring and prescribed recordkeeping. Or is it?

Arguably, no other sphere of manufacturing attracts so many imaginative thinkers – big-picture types who ignore trivia, but are passionate about essential details. They’re innovators like Edvaldo Antonio da Rosa, the founder of a cutting-edge Brazilian aerospace shop with a name that evokes Japan – Toyo Matic.

Located in the southern city of Bragança Paulista, about 85 km north of São Paulo, Toyo Matic serves prominent clients in the Americas, Europe and Asia. According to its customers, Toyo Matic helps put Brazil on the map as a center for modern precision machining. “That’s been our ambition since day one,” says da Rosa, with a smile. “We love to hear people say: ‘You can’t do that in Brazil!’”

The 20-year-old company earned its reputation by routinely doing the nearly impossible. Although it boasts a crew of 75 skilled machinists, operators, engineers and office staff, Toyo Matic’s success reflects the drive and technical talent of its energetic founder. With typical Brazilian humor, associates declare that if da Rosa stepped into a revolving door one space behind them, no one would be surprised to see him exit first!

Not So Simple

As prime aerospace manufactures strive to build with weight-saving monolithic components, the “nearly impossible” has become a common request. When Brazilian aircraft manufacturer Embraer recently combined several hydraulic control components for their popular ERJ-170/190 aircraft into a simpler monolithic unit, it proved to be anything but simple to make.

After eight companies in three countries failed to find a cost-effective way to manufacture the part, Embraer probably started having second thoughts. Fortunately, the design packet found its way back to Brazil – and Toyo Matic. “It’s now the most difficult part we make,” confides da Rosa. “It took many months of testing to develop the procedures.” The heavily milled 7075 aluminum block manifold has deep, intersecting blind holes, some as small as 2 mm diameter. Numerous other bores, recesses and curved surfaces often require 6-micron tolerances, and it requires 160 individual CMM checks to generate the final 61-page inspection report that accompanies each unit!

Toyo Matic solved many of the problems that baffled others by optimizing their tooling to reduce the major causes of inaccuracy: vibration, thermal growth and chip-induced tool runout. “We’ve distilled the manufacturing process down to only six operations,” da Rosa explains, “but we use 112 different tools!”

Finding the “technically sweet” tooling solution was a creative effort well suited to da Rosa’s talents. Before returning home in the 1980s to start Toyo Matic in Brazil, he worked in Toyokawa City, Japan, for the large international tool manufacturer, OSG Corporation. “I suppose,” he notes, “that’s one of our secrets.”

Secrets Too Numerous

Instead of searching tool catalogs for the perfect solution, da Rosa takes a more direct approach. “Whenever I have the time, I always build my own tools,” he explains. “The advantages are just too numerous to ignore.” By making his own, da Rosa can optimize each milling tool’s length-of-cut ratio for each operation – this usually means producing the shortest possible tool to do the job. Standard-reach tools are usable for a wide range of operations, but their longer shafts make them prone to axial runout, deflection and vibration. This is especially true when subjected to the heavy side loads of aggressive pocket milling – the most common scenario in an aerospace shop. The traditional way around these problems is to slow the feedrate. But that lengthens cycle time and can cause new problems, especially in hard materials like titanium, where a reduced feedrate can cause galling and work hardening. Also, with the reduced chip load, heat can quickly build up at the cutting edges, significantly shortening tool life. “Changing to the proper length tool is the better solution,” offers da Rosa, “even though the better solution isn’t always the obvious one.”

What about deep-reach situations where a longer tool is required? Again, da Rosa’s optimized approach pays off. He makes exact-length tools with an integral 40- or 50-taper base that allows direct mounting in the machine spindle. By eliminating the toolholder altogether, he bypasses a major source of runout error. It is this kind of ingenuity motivation toward precision that gives a shop the innovate edge in the CNC business.